ISO 16000, Neat Image default settings, auto-profile, quality mode normal This time it is ISO16000 with Topaz deNoise AI, settings Auto model, slight Recover Details option added Neat Image, ILCE7m3 specific profile for 6400ISO, quality mode Highest (with additional Artifact removal and Detail recovery Neat Image, ISO 8000, quality mode Normal, auto-profile ![]() Topaz deNoise AI processed shot at ISO8000, auto-model, with slight Recover Details added The whole idea of this post is to provide reference shots for people looking for options. I know there might be many variables making one application better, than the other, but this is just my personal taste that led me to this choice. So, there it is, non-scientific test of my bookshelf available for your reference. One may argue, that pictures should be subject to noise removal process one by one carefully and whilst with landscape pictures or astro it might be true for sport photography genre when I shoot hundreds of images per game it is just not feasible. Of course this test was biased towards the Neat Image as I was hoping to match Topaz deNoise engine for one simple reason: batch processing available with NI. ![]() At first I felt like Topaz deNoise is greatly superior by a big margin, but continuous tweaking of the Neat Image let me achieve very similar results. It is by no measure a scientific test, but merely comparison of the results available from both. Noiseware was out of the game early on as well, so was the NIK Dfine (despite it being free). ![]() I was running high ISO noise removal tests on quite a few applications available and narrowed my choice down to two: Neat Image and Topaz deNoise.Įarly on I eliminated DXO Photo Prime option as it was nowhere near the results I was hoping for (I spent the whole afternoon playing with it).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |